探索 TransferAI 的革命性功能

从课程规划到录取通知,AI 全程助力你的转学之路

AI文书导师

智能文书写作辅助

革命性的AI文书写作体验,从构思到润色,全程智能辅助。

智能文书分析

分析数千份成功案例,理解每所UC的偏好,生成个性化文书建议。

实时写作反馈

AI实时评估文书质量,提供改进建议,确保文书突出你的优势。

个性化素材库

根据你的背景故事,智能推荐最具竞争力的素材和写作角度。

AI驱动的智能文书助手

文书对比分析

拖动中间的滑块来对比优秀文书和待改进文书的区别。通过对比,你可以更好地理解什么样的写作方式更受欢迎。

Prompt 1 – Leadership Experience

“CAPITALISM CAUSES EXTINCTION! NUCLEAR WAR IS IMMINENT!” Initially, debate seemed nonsensical: lambasting opponents while arguing improbable scenarios. But over time I’ve learned that it’s more than competition that drives me to stay up all night looking for evidence: I love learning about the political and ideological underpinnings of our society and the way they shape us. On an easy debate tournament weekend, I research foreign diplomatic agendas and synthesize the information into coherent debate evidence. When tournaments become more hectic, however, I delve deeper into the works of philosophers and social critics and translate the knowledge into debate argumentation. While researching foreign policy, critical theory like Heideggerian phenomenology and constitutional details, I’ve developed an ability to critically analyze argumentation, make sense of the world around me and creatively express myself in an academic setting. My hard work has paid off. In the past four tournaments, I’ve received a Top 10 speaker award for the varsity division consisting of about 50 debaters. This trend has increased my credibility in my debate league to such a level that my partner and I were invited to participate in a series of public debates at LA City Hall to defend the water policy for the drought. The opportunity allowed me to actually impact the public’s awareness and accept a larger responsibility in the workings of my community. More importantly, however, debate has taught me to strategically choose my battles. When I prepare my arguments, I know that I can’t use all of them in the end of a round. I have to focus. I’ve learned to maximize my strengths and not try to conquer everything. Moreover, I’ve learned to be responsible with my choices; a wrong argument can mean losing if we can’t defend well. Not only do I now know how to zoom in from a bigger picture, but I also know how to pick the right place to zoom in to so I can achieve my goal. Debate has turned me into a responsible, optimizing, scrutinizing and strategizing orator.

字数: 337

Transfer-CopilotAI 分析

优秀文书特征分析

  • 💫Clear leadership narrative with measurable impact (Top-10 speaker; public debate invitation).
  • 💫Strong cause-effect reflection shows growth and values alignment.
  • 💫Quantified achievements back up claims—an admissions best-practice. :contentReference[oaicite:11]{index=11}
  • 💫Word count fits UC 350-word ceiling. :contentReference[oaicite:12]{index=12}
Transfer-Copilot推荐参考
AI 分析可信度
98%

Prompt 4 – Educational Opportunity / Cultural Insight

When Grandma moved into my home in my sophomore year, she always made the most scrumptious foods. She usually started with a base of garlic-ginger paste in some oil—duck fat because she said it gave her food extravagant flavors. She would gather the lamb she had bought from the market that day and butcher it before throwing it in the pot. Spices would start to be poured in slowly. Her final result: biryani. Most essays start this way: a really narrative introduction. Typically it isn’t bad, but the problem I have is deciding how much detail is too much. Sometimes I think about how the scent travels around the house. Perhaps I should describe how she toasts her spices. She would make so much that the leftovers became my lunch. But the kids at school looked at me strangely; their faces shriveled, mouths frowned. I hoped they were judging someone else. After all, it couldn’t possibly be me because I was a pretty laid-back individual. But it turned out they were. Did I offend them? Did I now commit a sin I was yet unaware of?

字数: 186

🔍

Transfer-CopilotAI 分析

智能优化建议

  • 💡Focuses on grandmother’s cooking process, not on the applicant—fails “show who you are” requirement. :contentReference[oaicite:14]{index=14}
  • 💡No clear reflection or takeaway; admissions readers can’t map it to UC comprehensive-review factors. :contentReference[oaicite:15]{index=15}
  • 💡Tone drifts into negativity and self-pity, which can alienate reviewers.
  • 💡Pretentious phrasing (“sin I was yet unaware of”) sounds inauthentic.
  • 💡Spends 100+ words on sensory description, leaving little space (350 max). :contentReference[oaicite:16]{index=16}
Transfer-Copilot待改进
AI 分析可信度
95%

在编程社区中找到归属感

目标学校: UC Berkeley | 当前字数: 320

87总体评分
故事结构92

故事架构完整,过渡自然,首尾呼应效果好

个人特色88

展现了独特的技术视角和社区贡献精神

语言表达85

用词准确,但部分描述可以更生动

主题契合84

与Berkeley的创新精神高度契合

AI优化建议

结构优化建议

建议加强第二段与主题的关联

内容深化重要

可以添加更多具体的技术贡献细节

语言提升参考

第三段的情感表达可以更细腻

文书修改历史

版本 32024-03-15
字数: 300AI建议: 5人工修改: 8
强化了技术贡献的具体描述
优化了结尾段落的情感升华
调整了段落顺序以提高逻辑性
版本 22024-03-10
字数: 260AI建议: 7人工修改: 12
添加了社区项目的具体例子
改进了开头的故事性
精简了过渡段落
版本 12024-03-05
字数: 280AI建议: 10人工修改: 15
完成初稿框架
确定核心故事线
构建基本论述

UC文书偏好分析

UC转学文书 PIQ 1

字数限制: 350
核心主题
创新精神社区影响多元文化学术热情
特色偏好

重点展现申请者如何推动创新和社会进步

推荐主题
  • 创新项目经历
  • 社区服务贡献
  • 跨文化交流
  • 克服技术挑战
避免主题
  • ×过于普遍的成长经历
  • ×缺乏个人洞察的成就
  • ×空泛的理想描述

UC转学文书 PIQ 2

字数限制: 350
核心主题
领导才能创造力韧性团队合作
特色偏好

强调个人成长和对多元化的理解

推荐主题
  • 领导力展现
  • 艺术创造
  • 运动精神
  • 文化认同
避免主题
  • ×过度强调学术成绩
  • ×缺乏个人反思
  • ×简单的活动列举

Transfer-Copilot 专属功能

💡"分析我的文书结构并提供改进建议"
✍️"帮我优化这段描述,使其更生动具体"
🎯"检查我的文书是否符合UC Berkeley的偏好"
开通 Transfer-Copilot 体验更多功能 →
89%
文书评分提升
95%
用户推荐率
5000+
成功案例

准备好开始你的转学之旅了吗?

立即体验 TransferAI 的强大功能,让AI助你实现转学梦想